I disagree.
I used Misinformation instead of Disinformation on purpose. It broader and not accusing others. The distinction is very much useless.
You define Disinformation as Misinformation with intent.
So it would only be a subgroub of Misinformation itself, kinda like apples and honeycrisps.
Thoose aren't clearly different in any meaningful way, just more specific.
Intent is something that is very hard to prove and will fail you as broad concept.
Can people transform Disinformation to Misinformation, when they lack intent?
Or is any form of sharing on twitter some form of intent, thereby converting all Missinformation to Disinformation?
Seriously! I don't know how these object transfer it's properties.
Disinformation includes a ton of advertisement, crypto NFT pyramid schemes and all kinds of fraud and scams.
Purposely used Misinformation to deceive others with clear intent.
Quite huge on twitter.
If Disinformation specifically defined as propaganda to deceive people or make them agreeable or "join the cause", you can add a ton of discussions on communism, fascism, socialism, democracy, conservatism, feminism, cult, sekts, diverse religions and so much more to twitters Disinformation.
People are lying to convince others, that is clearly Disinformation, or twitters main thing.
Twitter is awash with Misinformation and probably most of it classifies as Disinformation, as soon one can find any form of intent or purpose for it.
If you assume any unchecked information is Misinformation and posting it for retweets and likes is already intent, then everything on twitter is Disinformation.
You should not take anything on twitter at face value, if you can not verify it from a primary source.
Twitter is and will always be awash with misinformation.