Would someone who has a monetary incentive to comment pay to do so?
Would someone who has a monetary incentive to comment pay to do so?
What users do when seeing comments from accounts that have lower signals of quality is up to the user to decide. If they would rather listen to voices from unverified accounts over ones that have higher signals that's for them to ultimately choose. No one will be required to necessarily lock up capital to comment, and no one will be required to only look at comments from those who locked up capital.
This is just an example I thought up of on the spot, but I believe there are people who actually did a much deeper dive into these concepts.
We already have a solution to this problem: It's the internet as it is right now.
Is the opinion of some tech bro in the Bay Area making six figures really worth a hundred times as much? Do they have a hundred times as much to say or are they a hundred times as insightful?
Or maybe, just maybe, tying all participation to a monetary transaction is an incredibly classist thing to do that will shut out vast portions of the world so the rich and privileged can feel "free".