Regarding "ok to install a pro-US government in Ukraine" is a complete mischaracterisation; the question is whether it's OK for a nation to determine their own fate or not. Regardless of which power they choose to be "pro". I'm of the opinion that it is vital; you're clearly against that self-determination, calling it a "coup", repeatedly, for tendentious reasons.
So you didn't listen to the leaked phone call with Victoria Nuland handpicking who they wanted to take power? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
Government behaving badly? isn't the answer - according to you - to wait until the next election and change leaders (1)? "That is how democracy works."
Oh wait, Ukraine did that in 2019 when they elected Zelensky by a wide margin (2). Job done. right? Problem solved, no need to bring it up again.
All this irrelevant frothing about CIA, US is designed to misdirect away from Ukraine's self-determination. Who they align with or not is their choice. In 2014, 2019 or any other year.
The "Revolution of Dignity" was February 18-23rd 2014.
This BBC article[1] featuring the leaked transcript is from February 7th 2014, which is 2 weeks earlier.
So no, that is 100% incorrect. Does that change your view?
> So no, that is 100% incorrect.
Funny that Wikipedia lists a lot of things happening in December and January too. "100% wrong" is misleading as always. Looks like the Ukrainian people took the initiative on this one.
If that happened, would you then say future "Presidents" under that illegitimate system are legitimate?