Hacker News Reader

Comment by paulryanrogers | Hacker News Reader

So a derived password generator like SQRL and friends?

not sure, by looking at the sqrl wikipedia page it's not immediately obvious how this works. but yeah, "derived password generator" sounds correct, with one important detail. the there is (almost) no state at the client, and there is a mandatory online component where part of the derivation happens.

Is rotation supported? And if the main password is compromised doesn't that compromise all future derived passwords too?

It also means an attacker needs only the main password and knowledge of which derived system one uses. They don't need a vault file as well.

what does rotation mean? you can change your passwords, both the "master" which i rather call input, and the output password as well. i mean you can have a new output password without changing your input password.

and no although i can only guess what you mean with vaultfile, an attacker still needs access to the sphinx server, which has protections against bruteforce attacks.

you might want to read the whitepaper regarding bruteforce attacks: https://github.com/stef/pwdsphinx/blob/master/whitepaper.org...

Yeah this isn't a new concept. I personally like Lesspass.

the thing is. sphinx is designed by people with outstanding crypto protocol design credentials, the guys who came up with hmac and hkdf cryptographic primitives. the nice thing about sphinx is that it comes with "information theoretic security" - a very strong guarantee, not sure how the competition stacks up against this though...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com