I remember that upright vacuum cleaner (it's a vacuum cleaner without a long flexible pipe, it's just a long arm with wheels). I did not buy this.

The head was pivoting and had a small part of a flexible pipe.

After 6 months or so, that flexible pipe broke, it was impossible to fix it properly even with a strong duct tape. They asked about 100 euros to remplace the ENTIRE head part. The seller said "normal wear".

It's impossible to find a solution for this, unless you create some "durable design" label, which would essentially be an independent company testing every devices and items out there, and certifying those object as being "durable enough". The brand would just use those certifications.

Same thing for right to repair.

There are durable brands (Miele for example), but they are so much of a niche that they overprice their articles. Consumers are never aware because it's difficult to know what part will break and when.

Oddly, there are almost no brand that advertise the durability of their product. It's very easy to suspect all those brands agree with each other to not make durable items. Such anti competitive practices are often quite difficult to prove.

Look at how Louis Rossman spent YEARS making video for people to hear about just Apple. The electrical appliance is also a huge market, and electrical appliances will break more often, so without doubt it makes it much much harder to fight.