Meet
“Beat him with this $5 hammer until he gives up the keys”
Meet
“Beat him with this $5 hammer until he gives up the keys”
And the more important point is that while yes, you can still use violence, the violence becomes more complicated and costly. This is unlike the situation with gold where you can break into my house, shoot me in the head, and carry away my gold. With bitcoin, you need to negotiate with my mind to acquire my consent, even if that negotiation is torture.
You can break into a multi-keyed vault of gold given enough time. You will not break multisig ECDSA with all the computers on earth.
Here's how it goes, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjyJhKpLUBU
Nation states don't bother attacking bitcoin because there's little payoff relative to the cost. However, if we suppose there's a hostile country that held their central bank reserves in bitcoin, wouldn't that make a compelling case for the US government to invest in such infrastructure so that they can cripple them like they did with Russia?
1) fake wallets (give them a key to some coins but not all) 2) multisig - someone else has to provide the other half of the key or what you can give them is worthless etc