I don't think this it's this simple...even if it was, it doesn't sound very sustainable / appealing to me.
I don't think this it's this simple...even if it was, it doesn't sound very sustainable / appealing to me.
You have 24 hours every day. with 996 you:
- spend 8h sleeping,
- 12h working,
- at least 1h commuting both ways
that leave you only 3h left that you spend probably to eat, take shower, do grovery. Not much space for anything else.
I think I would prefer a prison life in some scandinavian country - at least you get a lot of free time to read all the books on your reading list.
While slavery is forced labor, 996 is more about people trying to get ahead. During my wall street days, I elected to work 8 am - 2 am, 7 days a week for subpar pay, all because of future potential rewards. Many of my peers dropped out due to the pressure and didn't stick around for the big payoffs. If you interview them, no doubt they would consider themselves "slave labor."
It's like looking at the high achiever students studying ungodly hours in Law schools or Medical schools. Similarly unappealing and less sustainable, but the rewards will be sweet (aside from the debt).
The corporate newspeak is honestly sickening.
Isn't this the sentiment and euphemism trotted out when referring to the "immigrant work ethic" across most cultures and countries?
In terms of "sickening" -- as a child it was drilled into my head that my parents and other (usually similarly immigrant) families worked incredibly hard so that they could provide a better life for their children, with the implicit expectation that I might do the same for my own some day.
Yes, it was drilled into your head. It was the carrot on the stick that keeps people moving.
With a ballooning national debt, worsening social blights, and an objectively bleaker economic outlook, I think it's finally time to admit that the carrot was never there--for the majority of us, and perhaps all of us if the nukes start flying.
It's "sickening" because it's a lie used to keep people thinking about a hopeful future that probably won't exist. If we didn't have this lie hanging over our heads, if we weren't chasing imaginary future rewards, we would demand equitable conditions now instead of continuing to chase after illusions.
"The science of government it is my duty to study, more than all other sciences; the arts of legislation and administration and negotiation ought to take the place of, indeed exclude, in a manner, all other arts. I must study politics and war, that our sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. Our sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry and porcelain." — John Adams, May 1780
Blind optimism is bound to get us into trouble. I'd prefer some facts that support the thesis that a strong work ethic always leads to a brighter future.
The Nazi's worked hard. The communists in Russia worked really hard. Things didn't turn out so well for them.
Direction is more important than force. I'd bet on a Volkswagen diven by a professional over a race car driven by a senile old lady.
The Chinese economy is not growing at a 'blistering pace' because of the long hours worked by these people. If this were true, we would see it in productivity figures but China is actually very low on those measures. It also seems to imply that the rest of the world is just lazier than China hence the lower growth. Are the people of South Korea for example that much lazier than their Chinese counterparts?
China grows at a rate of 6% because GDP growth isn't a measure of output in China in the same way as in the UK for example, it's a policy decision. This doesn't mean they invent the figures which many people seem to believe, the activity is actually taking place and that's obvious if you've ever been to China.
The economy is structured in a way to achieve growth targets. Local and provincial officials are rewarded for achieving growth targets with career advancement, so they come up with creative ways to fund dubious infrastructure investments or just use proceeds from land sales. SOEs engage in investment and production that would not be economic if not for discounted interest rates given by state owned banks, funded in part by negative real rates for deposit holders (the people working 16 hour days). These banks have loan books elevated levels of non-performing loans, but because of the closed financial system they don't have to realise these losses and can be quietly recapitalised if necessary. High level party officials have been talking about rebalancing from export and investment to consumption led growth since Wen Jiabao in 2007. Since then consumption share of GDP actually fell even lower.
China is not some ticking time bomb ready to explode on debt, they have similar levels of total debt to GDP as the US and EU do. But equally it's not some hyper efficient utopia full of the hardest working people on earth.
This line of thinking is really bothersome because believing that 'China is outworking us' will invariably result in political rhetoric in western countries aimed at making workers work longer hours or peeling back various labour protections. Not to say no reform in these areas is necessary of course.