Yep; this slide was worse than useless in that to the given audience it could instead read as an endorsement that launching is fine.

Pretty bad title for a blog post that talks about misleading powerpoint presentations. Some readers might make conclusions from the title alone, instead of reading the whole text below.

Any evidence to support that claim? NASA employees raised concerns about the severity of the damage, which shows the contents of the slide were effectively communicated to NASA engineers, but that leaders ignored them. Thus the slide was not a contributor.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2271525/It-better-d...