Is it great leadership? Top tier engineering talent? Lots of money? I simply don't understand.
Is it great leadership? Top tier engineering talent? Lots of money? I simply don't understand.
They have talent, they have execution, they have data about what rubs on macs they can use to optimize really well. But they have the profits and the cash reserves to make big bets and wait them out.
I think the M1 was expected 1 or 2 years before it was released. But they waited. Maybe it wasn’t good enough. Maybe the software support wasn’t there. But they didn’t have to push it out anyway and hope for the best. They could afford to wait.
Maybe that makes them willing to take bigger risks. Maybe through history they just knew Intel slowing down would happen (it bit them with 68k, then PPC, then G3/4/5) and we’re prepared in a way only done one with their own chips could be.
Hopefully leadership is really looking hard at this trend and adjusting future offerings accordingly. Consumers WANT machines with high performance and great I/O and they're willing to pay for them.
With Apple, Intel, and AMD really stepping up the last couple of years, I think the next decade of personal computing is going to be really exciting!
You have to remember that since the 2014 retina, Apple's offerings have been a bit crap.
This is a return to form ( and a good one at that) but its not worthy of hero worship. They've done a good job turning things around, which is very hard.