Personally I don't. It's not speech from an American but rather a foreign country (or sometimes not even a human).
And it incites harm, which is one of the restrictions that can be placed on speech.
And it incites harm, which is one of the restrictions that can be placed on speech.
But that doesn't have anything to do with constitutionally protecting 3rd party nations using platforms/speech for propaganda in our (or any other opposing) country.
Seems ridiculous on its face to try to confuse or equate the two and argue the point.