There is a group of people for whom the side effects are completely fine, welcome even. It would be a reduction in ability of care if the drug became unapproved. Maybe I'm just oversimplifying, but couldn't people who are not ok with the side effects, not take the drug? I find it ok to say, here are the side effects, and here are their prevalence and leave it up to the patient to decide, but perhaps I'm misunderstanding the point.