That's surprising. Do you have a source?
That's surprising. Do you have a source?
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/24/health/covid-deaths-now-y...
NY Times, Washington Post, and other media have similar stories.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/#graph-...
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
>The people dying from Covid-19 now tend to be younger than before, and they're overwhelmingly unvaccinated, experts say.
To be honest, I'm at the point now where the vaccine has been available for a year. Everyone who was going to get it has had it, and you're not likely to change the minds of those who won't get it. As heartless as this sounds, I'm tired of waiting for those people to come around. They are making the choice to not get it, let them live with whatever the consequences may be instead of keeping shit closed/restricted just because that group is making poor choices.
Edit: I realize that some people can't get it for various medical reasons, and I empathize with them. It's everyone else I'm referring to.
A good recent video on the subject with something resembling science: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va0RCgbywGc
This is 2 weeks old and already out of date. Numbers are in freefall. It's now at 1,357. And cases have dropped sharply and consistently for a few weeks which means the (lagging) drop in deaths will continue for a few weeks.
Not to mention people under immunosuppression or legitimately unable to get vaccinated (e.g. allergies or immunodeficient) - these poor souls are effectively locked into their homes as a permanent jail.
There are people confined to wheelchairs yet we allow others to walk.
Why do you believe this to be true? Seems exaggerated to me.
I never expected a "free democracy" to run into basic stalinist subversion of facts, but here we are.
2 years into just 2 weeks to stop the spread of information.
CNN does it constantly. The headline and first para is editorial, the remainder is reportage. Totally untrustworthy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/national/corona...
But what's different between 2020 and now:
- We understand covid risk, treatment, etc. better now. There's a box around it. In 2020 we didn't know what would happen, if there would ever be a vaccine, or what variants might do. We don't know what the next variant will be, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it, but "variant" is a less scary word if only due to having been through two of them and come out.
- In 2022 the deaths are more voluntary than in 2020. Of course some people can't get a vaccine or remain at higher risk despite a vaccine. And it's a tragedy that the world will remain more dangerous for some, maybe permanently. But after 2 years of on and off measures we know we can't keep it up forever.
I'd be all for making it a social convention to wear masks (at certain times) going forward every flu season, which some cultures already did before covid. While wearing a mask I didn't get my annual cold last winter, which was awesome. If you de-politicize it and think of it as a piece of cloth, it stops being a big deal. But keeping stuff closed needs to stop.
The best theory of why some people are asymptomatic with covid is previous coronavirus infections, from the common cold, so maybe this isn't the best approach. ;)
Our immune systems weren't designed with a clean room in mind. There are a few childhood cancers and problems that are possibly caused by not having enough exposure to pathogens, like leukemia, blood cancers, allergies. So, I think it's complicated.
That's a convenient time window. If you extend it even one month into 2021, you include the large winter surge.
> at any time in 2020
It looks like today's 7-day average deaths in CA (192) is below the Dec 31, 2020 number (250).