Russian Army is using ambulances to transport ammunition in Ukraine
twitter.com
twitter.com
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docindex/v2...
Let's hope this time the ICC gets to deal with the war criminals unlike in many previous occurrences.
Suppose you have to choose between ① a negotiated peace, with a return to Ukraine's old borders, no reparation payments and a complete amnesty, or ② to fight on, with a hope of victory for the Ukraine that enables reparations and ICC trials. Everyone else in the negotiations has voted, your vote tips the scale. What do you choose?
And if you choose the second option and someone later argues that you should be tried for complicity in the war crimes that happened after your decision to prolong the war, what do you think about that accusation?
This isn't simple.
I'd love to see Putin in a Ukrainian prison, but if the war could be ended with Putin moving to live a life of luxury with 200 servants on a beautiful tropical island, inaccessible to assassins… I'd say yes to that. At once. Sigh. So I can see why many wars ends without anyone being dragged in front of the ICC.
It's a side point, anyway. My main point was that peace has its cost, and value, and to illustrate how difficult the decisions can be. (I wonder whether someone downvoted me because they think these things should be simple and we should all be able to achieve the bestest outcome?)
Somewhat relevantly, I can strongly recommend this book: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo363585...
https://www.businessinsider.com/hiring-ambulances-to-beat-mo...