I think that Markdown's success is due to a lack of a widely-used, simple alternative that's well-specified.
Org is easily and objectively the best markup but of course it's only very very recently that there was a non-emacs implement worth a damn.
I think that Markdown's success is due to a lack of a widely-used, simple alternative that's well-specified.
Org is easily and objectively the best markup but of course it's only very very recently that there was a non-emacs implement worth a damn.
The advantage of markdown isn't robustness, it's simplicity. Preteens can get a handle on it in minutes when using Reddit.
The main benefit that all these markup-shorthands serve IMO is getting people to add meaning semantically rather than with presentation. Word processor users typically adjust font size and color to make headings, even when given a list of headings right in the ribbon. Markdown is just an HTML shorthand: you can only work with semantic meaning.
Indeed and therein lies what I view is Markdown's worst feature.
@@html:<b>@@bold text@@html:</b>@@
Or inline LaTeX, which is arguably much worse than markdown's HTML fuzziness: https://orgmode.org/manual/LaTeX-fragments.html#LaTeX-fragme...>To avoid conflicts with currency specifications, single ‘$’ characters are only recognized as math delimiters if the enclosed text contains at most two line breaks, is directly attached to the ‘$’ characters with no whitespace in between, and if the closing ‘$’ is followed by whitespace, punctuation or a dash.
If I understand that correctly, it means this is LaTeX:
$a^2
+1
=b$
But this is not: $a^2
+1
+2
=b$
Similarly, this is apparently an inline chunk of LaTeX: https://travel.stackexchange.com/questions/39527/which-count... USA tends to use $123 to show dollar amounts,
but e.g. Germany apparently sometimes uses 123$.I laughed.