Potato farmers conquer a devastating worm with paper made from bananas
science.org
science.org
Kudos to the NC state team for setting up this control, and digging into the results, especially when the purpose of their experiments was different (their intent was to find a better way to deliver pesticides).
It is amazing how many times this happens - unintended or unanticipated results from an experiment, often peripheral results, which turn out to be extraordinarily interesting (usually for a different purpose as the original experiment), if observed and followed-up on with rigor and innovation.
Every time something isn't behaving as it should, somewhere in the bytes of RAM will be the reason it isn't working properly. You could dump that ram and single step the code to find the fault. And then fix it for the millions of other people out there.
Or you could just reboot, and the problem will be erased, and probably never happen again to you for many years, by which time you'll have moved onto new hardware anyway.
1) a lot of cancer research occurred between the random bacteria observation and viable chemotherapy.
2) ignoring the above, you still have too compare the success rate of funding cancer research vs random experiments.
If I'm remembering correctly, the scientists were trying to find a way to see if alcohol impacted some drug, but wanted the measurement to be blind. So don't participants would need to drink alcohol without being sure if they had or not. The author and his wife spent a lively evening trying to find some kind of mix that hid the alcohol and found grapefruit to be very good at it.
Then when the actual study ran, they had participants take the drug or a control as well as vodka with grapefruit or just grapefruit. And to their surprise, the grapefruit had a massive effect regardless of the vodka!
"But vindication implies that we are out to get somebody. And we weren't. We had no idea that this was out there."
https://www.npr.org/2015/09/24/443053672/how-a-little-lab-in...
If the work was not done by the end of the break, you could get excused from school for as long as needed to finish. Kind of weird priorities for the area if you ask me.
And yes, it was just as glamorous as it sounds.
Heck I've thought about taking a week off to do spud harvest, take a chance to get out of the office and do something physical for once.
I still kick myself for not just grabbing a one of their fire extinguishers off the back of the truck and putting it out myself. From outside the fence where the public are allowed to go at all times and no electricity magically kills them.
1: https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Data-research-and-too...
https://bangordailynews.com/2016/10/08/news/aroostook-county...
> These microscopic worms... cutting harvests by up to 70%. > The new technique has boosted yields fivefold in trials with small-scale farmers in Kenya
Seems like there are factors beyond the worms in Kenya, unless they are really saying that they are getting over 150% yield after the banana tree paper is used?
They link to a source that indicates that losses can be as high as .. well, exceeding the value of a seed stock used to plant the crop, so I guess that is greater than 100%?https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/27034#tosummaryOfInvasive...
The actual article in question cites 60% losses: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-022-00852-5
The five-fold statement appears to be sloppy/misleading writing with respect to comparing the improvement over the baseline, not 5x the actual production. The article is not generally dishonest but the specific claims seem to be well into the "geez.. IDK guys.." territory.