Ukrainians are also forced into a conflict they don't want. Unfortunately, it's up to both the Ukrainians and Russians to do something about it, not Ukrainians alone.
The Ukrainians clearly made their decision. Now it's up to the Russian people to make theirs.
There's nothing we can realistically do. It's up to the military to start a civil war.
> There's nothing we can realistically do.
Then you get to collectively carry the responsibility for that "inability"; for, by not rising up as one against the dictatorship, passively allowing it to continue. That's what was seen as appropriate for the nation you fought in your Great Patriotic War, so why shouldn't it be appropriate for yours?
When enough citizens revolt there will be a point where police forces realize that they are on the wrong side, either for moral or self preservation reasons. Once they start refusing to defend the dictator, that dictator's power is done.
Russia is a non-democratic country...
That's not true. The President of Ukraine who was overthrown in 2014 (Yanukovych) was democratically elected in 2010 in an election that international observers called fair, truly competitive, and an impressive display of democracy.[1]
That President was supported mostly by the people of eastern Ukraine and opposed by the people of western Ukraine.
1: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/feb/08/viktor-yanukov...
It's an incredibly difficult thing to do, and it can't come from the outside. Russians have to collectively decide that they don't accept the situation anymore, and that they're prepared to pay the price with their blood. They did in 1918, and I wish I could support them to do it again.
Of course it's easier said than done. And yet I'm not claiming that it's easy, quite the opposite.
So was Nazi Germany. Everyone there still had to accept thorough "de-Nazification" after WW2, though.
(This makes it doubly ironic how exactly that is what Putler claims to be doing to Ukraine.)