Doomed ship of gold’s ghostly picture gallery is plucked from the seabed
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
So what I believe happened given both sources is that the investors paid 12M to get the 13 tons of gold (worth 800M) and then 4M worth of gold (0.5%) went "missing".
The investors wanted all of their 13 tons including the missing 64kg.
And so now that person is in jail without a sentence until he tells them where those 0.5% have gone.
It seems that some small part of the gold was recovered, some of it was sold/auctioned. 92% of the gold was awarded to the discovery team.
But the instead of divining the god he had (500 gold coins), he went into hiding.
The value of the 500 gold coins seems to be about $19.4 millions.My best guess is that it was easiest to sail down the west coast, cross the land at Panama where it is relatively narrow, then take another ship north up the east coast.
I wasn't aware that was a common route, had just assumed that people crossed the continent.
>A federal law addresses individuals like Thompson, known as “recalcitrant witnesses”. The law holds that 18 months is generally the limit for jail time for contempt of court orders. But a federal appeals court last year rejected Thompson’s argument that that law applies to him.
>Thompson hasn’t just refused to answer questions, the court ruled: he’s also violated the requirement that he “assist” the parties by refusing to execute a limited power of attorney to allow that Belizean trust to be examined, as required under his plea deal.
>“The order isn’t intended to solely seek information, it’s to seek information for the purposes of recovering these unique assets,” said Andrew Geronimo, a law professor and legal analyst, and director of Case Western University’s First Amendment Clinic.
Sounds like he is in there for good. Anyone from the US heard of anything similar? Its really hard to wrap your head around that not complying with a plea deal can get you thrown away in definitively. Plus a thousand dollar a day in costs. As far as i can tell even grand juries can only get you for 18 months
On a lighter note, had a laugh at the pictures subtitle and the later text >A daguerreotype of a young woman found on the wreck. ‘She’s the Mona Lisa of the depths. This beautiful 18-year-old with her shoulders bare with jewellery and lace.’
>He pointed to a photograph of a young woman whose beauty captivated the men who recovered it: “She’s the Mona Lisa of the depths. This beautiful 18-year-old person, or however old she is, with her shoulders bare with jewellery and lace
"or how ever old she is". Framing is sometimes really important.
I see more and more sites lately that just don't work on Firefox and force the use of Chrome or some other browser.
Perhaps it's time for the Firefox developers to implement Chrome compatibilty (very sadly).