The 04 R1 I used to ride had a goofy double throttle system where the cable directly drove the first set of intake butterflies, but a duplicate set downstream was computer controlled via servo. This was the generation that introduced catalytic converters to bikes, and I presumed the intention was to limit throttle opening rates via computer overriding what the rider had done when opened too quickly. Conventionally that transient pressure drop situation is handled by throwing a bunch of excess fuel into the air stream to not hesitate and stumble from most the fuel falling out of suspension and clinging to the walls, i.e. they were cleaning up emissions.
Even this seemingly benign and dead-stupid bit of a computer override almost caused me to crash on multiple occasions. If the rider opened the throttle aggressively far beyond where the servo operated throttle was at, and immediately began dialing it back to reduce the acceleration, the servo operated throttle would continue opening to meet the still more open cable operated throttle's position. So rider is telling bike to accelerate less, and bike is accelerating more in a game of computer catch up. This is not only very unexpected on a naturally aspirated ICE, but outright dangerous on a nearly 200HP sportbike.
At least it was relatively trivial to remove the plates from the servo actuated throttle shaft and let the computer keep pointlessly twisting a bare shaft.