Anonymous takes .ru government websites offline
twitter.com
twitter.com
Anonymous was a household brand name during Obama as they were exposing a lot of what he was doing behind the scenes, like drone strikes on innocent civilians and illegally targeting Americans overseas without due process. It was in the news constantly with their videos at a time when most people still watched TV.
You never know whether Anonymous is one angry teenager or an entire nation-state, so it behooves you to not piss "them" off.
I don't know who the current owner is but it's certainly not to be trusted by any hacktivist.
Edit: Another owner of the YourAnonNews account was Dan Stuckey, a Vice journalist, who was the one affiliating with Sabu[1]. Him and Dell operated the account for a long time, maybe they still do.
[0] https://www.gawker.com/anonymous-tries-to-found-a-legit-news... [1] https://thecryptosphere.com/2015/03/15/fuck-anonymous-im-at-...
If you're a fan of the Wichowski Siblings then you may recall the quote "You cannot kill an idea" from V for Vendetta (and also the silly mask). They use this to demonstrate and inspire the power of cellular, decentralized activism.
I'm confused by this, are you referring to Lulzsec specifically? I've never heard Anonymous framed as leftist, and I'm certain that not everyone involved in pre-2011 hacktivism, such as Project Chanology[0], are in prison.
But OP is probably confusing these shenanigans with Lulzsec, an supposed anonymous hacker collective but really FBI-led operation ran by their informant Sabu, who supplied hacktivists with targets to hack and later jail them (for example Jeremy Hammond who was sentenced to 10 years in prison because of this).
Bah, no you're not; you just hacked that.
http://vkrosse2.ru/proxy/browse.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmil.ru%2...
The people in the video are complaining about it:
– It’s all of them [channels]?
– Yep
– Damn
From past experience with military-spec software development, it’s usually highly redundant and isolated. The operating systems are often real-time Linux-based ones (at least the ones I was exposed to).
If there’s Windows running there somewhere, it’s unlikely it’s in a critical system.
I used to think that as well but I recall a time when a bunch of US tanks were blue-screening and that in effect disabled navigation or something to that effect. Maybe I can find those old articles. But you are probably right. If it were possible someone probably would have done it by now.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/no-our-new-aircraft-carriers...
but I believe it is completely isolated/air gapped.
[1] : https://t.me/itarmyofukraine2022/5
[2] : https://mobile.twitter.com/hexdefined/status/149732755266667...
[3] : https://web.archive.org/web/20220225193536/https://twitter.c...
It's not like they have disrupted in field command and control, communications, etc of the attacking forces. It's not like they've shud down the power to the offices of those in charge, or taken over Putin's personal bank accounts, or anything useful at all.
Do the people of Ukraine benefit at all from this? Does this show NATO leaders that they have no backbone?
All this is doing is causing some Russian IT group of people to do extra work. These IT people may not even be supporting Putin's decision.
Many Russians are complicit. They are not entitled to comfort nor stability while their leadership commit atrocities. Revolution could take down Putin from within if he overextends his resources - unlikely, but possible, and that possibility increases if regular Russians start to feel antagonistic to Putin and the consequences of his actions.
It wouldn't be a far stretch for Putin to declare these actual attacks on Russia since they are not private business but gov't networks. If they trace these attacks back to NATO countries, it could then be used as casus belli
Anonymous hackers probably don't want to start ww3, and there are likely embedded agents keeping an eye on participants to prevent overreach. It's ironic to think that Russian infrastructure is being actively protected by western intelligence to carefully manage the pressures and escalation. Or maybe optimistic...
I think it's established fact that power, water, gas, and communications are fragile and subject to disruption at a moments notice more or less worldwide. Rigorous projections show 90%+ casualty rate in dense urban regions if power gets shut down during winter months. Even without nukes or bullets, cyber war could kill billions.
For the record, I am not advocating one way or another, but I just want to point that 'just doing something' may be counter-productive.
I don't see how Anonymous is concerned with NATO at all.
> What's the point?
Someone in Russia will have to deal with it, probably intelligent, technically skilled people which would be more useful elsewhere. It causes Russia to loose face. If any critical services run through this then to might impact ground operation (although the Russian army seems to use print outs a lot).
Yeah? And? So? What? Western business IT personnel have to deal with this on a daily basis from Russian based operatives. It doesn't really mean too much, as they are staffed for this anyways.
I think it's all funny, but nothing serious. Any attempt to promote this as anything more than an annoyance to people that have no importantance to the actual matter at hand of a bully invading another sovereign country is just juvenile.
I think you are the one who is misinformed. We have internet, you know. Srsly, open Telegram, open VK, open 2ch.hk, open any other random forum in ru-net.
Where do people get weird ideas like that?
Except just leave the infrastructure locked permanently or at least until Russia withdraws.
I am more than sure Putin’s army has been preparing for all scenarios for years.
How does taking sites offline free people of censorship?
Censorship is essentially never just the act of censoring, it's typically a larger program in action and almost always includes state propaganda filling the vacuum they create after they censor. They're taking down, or trying to take down, some of the fill-in propaganda that the Russians will otherwise be receiving domestically or that the state machinery will otherwise be pushing outward (eg via RT) for foreign audience consumption.
If you want to combat censorship, you'd also ideally want to target the propaganda delivery methods they're using to replace free information.
Stripping the situation back to vacuum would be better than just leaving the Russian state propaganda to fill in the vacuum. That'd be a win.
(I realize I have a bias towards U.S. style free speech. Maybe censorship is best for other cultures. I am still unconvinced.)