One is dealing with his own money while the other is not.
Another important point: One is much closer to anarcho-capitalism in philosophy than the other.
edit: if you downmod me, please explain why. this is a great opportunity to learn.
I suggest you explain your own comment in the first place. Who is closer to anarcho-capitalism in philosophy? The former central banker or the guy who wants to increase taxes?
What do you mean? Is that a good thing or a bad thing?