Microsoft employees "leaving in droves" during Ballmer's speech
winrumors.com
winrumors.com
* Balmer doesn't lead, he believes in "survival of the fittest" in the more jungle sense of the word. While he doesn't actively pit the product teams against one another, he encourages them to battle with each other and only come to him with the result, never with the conflict or questions about who should do what.
* As a result of this, the teams HATE each other. The Dev Tools team hates the Windows team. The Windows team hates the Xbox team. The Xbox team hates the MSN team and so on. There is a particularly odd level of animosity between the devtools and windows teams.
The Xbox doesn't even run a special version of Windows, it is a custom OS built with some of the core kernel, but very little else. This created a lot of conflict between those two teams as well.
Every team feels like they are 6 months away from being cut and as a result try and block any effort any other team makes at impeding on their turf.
* The company has shed most of the strong/independent/curious lead devs by now a many found it impossibly pointless to work there.
Discovered a new way to make NTFS faster? Too bad, it's not going in the mainline. Found a new way to make DX render faster on modern hardware in low-powered systems? Great, now go sit at your desk and shut up.
There was no nurturing of new ideas because of this "protect your turf at all costs!" culture that Balmer created.
My buddy talked for about an hour... it was fascinatingly horrible to listen to, but it seems while BillG was the benevolent dictator type much like Jobs was, Balmer is the polar opposite in every wrong way.
More like a absentee father that loves watch you fight with your brothers, but otherwise doesn't really care what you do.
The summary is that according to 2 individuals who claim to be employees who were actually at the meeting, the meeting ran as usual, and the people who left early did so to traffic. I wonder when the tech reporting industry will tire of reporting Microsoft's death?
Swap "control" with "lead", and you've got a valid question. Leadership is job #1 for a CEO. You must have the confidence of your employees if you want to lead. I can't understand how anyone could have confidence in Ballmer at this point. He's called it so incredibly wrong in so many cases.
I'm not saying that Microsoft should adjust their business strategy to match that of their competitors, but Ballmer just so completely misunderstands his competitor's successes that I can't see how he can be expected to formulate a counter-strategy. Not only was he wrong, but he was utterly confident in his assessment. How does a guy like that lead anyone who has a clue?
If he isn't in control, then who is?
If that's true, I'm not surprised that nobody is happy at this meeting. The company has set an expectation of pain, marked by the date of this meeting. Why would anyone be happy about it?
But I'll take this opportunity for an Ballmer rant. I don't like Ballmer, but I can't tell if his leadership style is hands-off or impotent?
The company is raking in money. Certain product groups are doing fantastic, but others are floundering (and sometimes climb back from the grave, eg. Windows Phone). The various groups inside Microsoft are notorious for lack of communication and cooperation.
Maybe I have my answer. I'd certainly like to see a new leadership that killed the "embrace and extend" mentality and forced an emphasis on adopting open standards (which currently attempts to come up from the bottom (engineers)). If the shenanigans stopped, things could really take off. They have solid products, it just seems like the mentality and corporate/marketing actions of Microsoft sabotage it all.
Note: I'm not a MS basher by any means, take a look at my comment history.
The company highlights it's flagship products (Windows, Office, XBox, Devenv), but leaves all the little products by the wayside. I don't know how many people outside of enthusiasts are aware of, for example, SkyDrive and Windows Live Mesh. I'd think the company would do more to highlight the whole experience it offers as a counter to either Apple's or Google's offerings. Let the consumer know that Microsoft does more than just Windows and Office.
Then there's the fact that the article is thin wrapper around a PI article about anonymous comments made on an anonymous (purportedly) MS employee's blog.
The only value that this article could possibly bring is to discuss Steve Balmer in general, and for that a self-post like "Hey, do you guys like the job Balmer is doing" would do a better job, and it would almost certainly sink like a stone. I'm actually embarrassed for this community that this made it to #1. Must be a slow news day.