I suppose that's why it has grown in price in spite of its supply slowly increasing. Because it's unusable! (sarcasm)
> "problem" being solved
In essence, it takes scarcity to make scarcity. So, to get digital scarcity, you have to fork over scarce resources.
But I agree with you that the computing cost is excessive, and the reward function was not well calibrated.
On the other hand, the rate of the explosion in price could not have been foreseen.
The fact that the price is consistently increasing is what makes it an unusable currency. A deflationary currency is a useless medium of exchange as any rational actor will not spend it due to the potential future increase in price. I hold multiple crypto assets but I think you have to be kidding yourself if you think that Bitcoin and the like are usable currencies.
I am looking to buy a flat, so I will spend some of my Bitcoin.
just slightly worse (because its brand new and you keep speaking against it instead of improving it, for some reason)
and also with better security, and portability.
Rhetorical, almost flabbergasted questions for you to consider:
What problems does "money I can store on a Ti-83" solve?!
What problems does the Ethereum Virtual Machine solve, as far as turning decentralized network code into a server/computer?
What security?
> What problems does the Ethereum Virtual Machine solve, as far as turning decentralized network code into a server/computer?
Given that the eth VM uses a fraction of a single percentage of its processing power to run smart contracts (like, 0.00000001%), and the rest in redundantly verifying those transactions, it's not solving any problem of decentralised processing in a useful way.