That's inaccurate and backwards. 338 Hz is not in that range, and it can't be doubled or halved to fit in that, but it's a perfectly fine not. The range is more about tuning (which is a choice) than about 440-880Hz being something special.
>All of these things messily overlap and create multiple conflicting names for the same things, because they’re attempts to describe human intention rather than an objective waveform.
Nope, they don't overlap any more messily than 1+2 == 2+1, or in how 0.99999... == 1.