> they did it volontary [sic]

That really undersells the `static if considered paper` which has got to be the most offensive standards paper I've read.

> so there must be arguments against 'scopelesd constexpr if'

I've yet to find any. What I don't understand is: you hardly ever need to introduce a scope with Ds `static if` and in the very rare cases you do it takes all of two keystrokes, but with C++ you are completely unable to get rid of the scope.