I suspect pg is referring to the plans founders make to impress investors, rather than to figure out which problems to solve.
I suspect pg is referring to the plans founders make to impress investors, rather than to figure out which problems to solve.
The business plan for a startup pitching to a VC will look different than the plan an SMB submits to a bank
I do think the plan you linked to is more thorough than what the majority of SMBs will be writing. YC is another league of finance. Most SMBs I know are not very sophisticated
It also included a background check on the management IIRC
Can you link to an example SMB business plan? I once tried to help a neighborhood grocer with financing and I can assure you they weren't writing a sophisticated business plan.
No it's not. The point is that what most start-ups submit as a "business plan" is just a load of b.s.
The questions that are asked in the YC interview draw out the information that _should_ be in a business plan.
In most cases though YC applications are meant as a way to evaluate the team, not the business and that's where the difference lies between the data they collect and what your typical business plan shows, even if there are superficial similarities the goal is an entirely different one.
I think PG & Co would invest readily into a fantastic team with a crappy business plan knowing full well that they are effectively already investing in the first - or second - pivot.
For them it doesn't matter: people driven to succeed will try to do so one way or the other and have a leg up on people that are not like that.