Show HN: 50x50.space a public board to doodle together
50x50.space
50x50.space
Just getting the explainer text in the header, "Recent board" and a ghost emoji at the bottom and the rest is completely blank.
From their homepage, it doesn't sound like it's too obsessed with performance ;)
Vercel combines the best developer experience with an obsessive focus on end- user performance.That's a bit harsh. You don't know that (and the dev is reading these comments).
Vercel is good :)
- /r/place
- [milliondollarhomepage](http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/)
- [yourworldoftext](https://www.yourworldoftext.com/)
- and someone here pointe out [satoshis.place](https://satoshis.place/)
haven't heard last two, seems interesting.
I think this could be more attractive if done as a turn-based play. Fill a square within, say, 10 sec and then wait until everyone currently online finishes their turn. And so on.
Access restricted Site: 50x50.space This site is blocked. Please contact your administrator for further assistance.
Bit tongue in cheek really. People are already slamming NFTs as useless scams, the media would have a field day over this lol.
You can't use colors... they've been sold, lol.
Though it brings a less-technological yet more philosophical question about NFTs and what they represent being forever the same/frozen, or not, though I don't think it's the discussion for here.
Off-chain solutions where longevity is concerned don't sit well with me - I don't personally trust oracles to be available for eternity or remain benevolent. Your approach based on a smart contract sounds good as it's on-chain. But would it be preferred to have a dynamic / mutable NFT standard with this capability baked in somehow?
Anyway not really my wheelhouse, and as you say probably off topic for now. Just something I find interesting to consider.
Strictly speaking, ERC-721 (the official standard for NFTs on Ethereum) doesn't say that whatever is returned from tokenUri function (which defines all the properties, name, image etc. of the particular NFT) can't change. So in simpler terms the contract can change the tokenUri afterwards (of course if there is code in the contract to support that).
It boils down to how users/community perceive NFTs, and your house analogy is perfect for what we are doing (in our case something is "happening to the house as time passes" but you get the idea). In the technical sense the standard is agnostic about tokenUri mutability, as long as the token DOES have a tokenUri (which can just be a base64 "data:" URI anyway).
It will be interesting to see what's possible, I'm pretty much sure that the "killer app" based on ERC-721's haven't been invented and when this Ponzi-like ridiculously pricing of non-functional NFTs mania is over, we'll start seeing some real solutions.