Tesla factory is “racially segregated workplace,” Calif. state agency alleges
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Jury orders Tesla to pay $137 million to former employee over racist treatment
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/04/business/tesla-racism-law...
Menial tasks, slurs and swastikas: many black workers at Tesla say they faced racism
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/30/business/tesla-factory-ra...
This article doesn't say it, but the last time this came up, in small print, it was admitted that all reported instances of racial slurs were delivered by black people to other black people in a friendly manner.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/05/tesla-must-pay-137-million-t...
relevant line.
“In addition to Mr. Diaz, three other witnesses (all non-Tesla contract employees) testified at trial that they regularly heard racial slurs (including the n-word) on the Fremont factory floor. While they all agreed that the use of the n-word was not appropriate in the workplace, they also agreed that most of the time they thought the language was used in a ‘friendly’ manner and usually by African-American colleagues.”
OR logout
Also, any rational observer isn't foolish enough to believe friendly communication or even conflict between black people is racial.
Still waiting for proof.
This does not happen to other corporations, with such frequency and seriousness.
Is there some sort of reporting bias here? Or is Tesla really a reprobate?
So, my best theory is that it’s kinda like the paparazzi. You find the celebrities going through a train wreck life situation (divorce, drugs, etc) and cover them. This organically brings the tabloids to specific targets.
Elon is a very natural target. In this case he has taken a strong stance on workers being able to work during Covid, so in a way he put his battle flag up on that hill. That’s the hill the parasites will flock to.
Rogan took a stance on free speech. So that’s the hill they fought him on (found all the shit he has to apologize for).
The market for this is quite natural at this point, and I have no other words to describe it as repetitious as it is.
The only thing I can think of is the new corporate diversity/woke organizations that want to cultivate an environment where companies need to pay them to keep things from becoming a PR nightmare (that is a new type of manufactured threat). Organizations haven’t even been effective at coercing companies about global labor practices (Nike’s slave wage factories in China), but somehow this new attack vector of social propriety has been extremely effective.
It’s been iteratively effective. Pointing out Nike has 1, then 2, then 3 slave wage factories never escalated the situation. Pointing out Rogan antivax stuff, then the N-word compilation, and perhaps soon that he used steroids, has been hyper effective to reach a knock out blow. By the time we get from ‘Elon’s factories segregates black people’ to the n-th ‘and his ex said he was verbally abusive’, he could be done.
Something to keep track of, or certainly pay some people to ward something like that off. That would make the most sense.
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/ford-motor-co/summary?id=D0...
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/general-motors/summary?id=D...
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toyota-motor-corp/summary?i...
Not particularly hard, as it turns out.
You would hope people in high places wouldn’t be petty or personally vindictive, but there is plenty to gain from the personal rush you get ruining someone’s life (or at least a couple of months of it).
Happens sadly more frequently than you’d hope.
1) public figure with household brand
2) controversial statements
3) broad following willing to defend them
Going after personalities clearly over the line is of no value. To optimize clicks and engagement, you want the issue at hand to be as contested as possible : topics the public is deeply split on, subjective, complex, and flimsy or poorly articulated.
The more misinformation the better, because it drive more engagement as people read and post it both to support their priors or show how outrageous it is.
There is a tiny market for comprehensive reporting analyzing issues from multiple perspectives.
That said, I do think this story is newsworthy based on the severity of the DFEH lawsuit and prior history with the Diaz case. The bigger question is not if there is bias in news reporting, but DFEH action. That is to say, is Tesla actually an outlier in workplace environments or selected based on other criteria.
As early as 2012, Black and/or African American Tesla workers have complained that Tesla production leads, supervisors, and managers constantly use the n-word and other racial slurs to refer to Black workers. They have complained that swastikas, “KKK,” the n-word, and other racist writing are etched onto walls of restrooms, restroom stalls, lunch tables, and even factory machinery. They have complained that Black and/or African American workers are assigned to more physically demanding posts and the lowest-level contract roles, paid less, and more often terminated from employment than other workers. They have also complained that Black and/or African American workers are often denied advancement opportunities, and more often and more severely disciplined than non-Black workers.
So you think the workers who stuck their necks out to file these complaints -- going back as early as 2012, mind you -- have done so to spite Musk for being a thorn in the side of ... "various hegemonic cultural narratives and political agendas"?
Or that if a lawsuit of this gravity and nature does get filed against lawsuit -- that the press should keep mum about it?
That absolutely does not follow from my other comment.
Other than to insinuate that the main reason "these stories from Tesla keep coming out" ... is because Musk is a "thorn in side" of various narratives.
I notice everyone denying these claims seems to ignore that.
One would have to be a complete moron to stay poor if white and living in an apartheid state where almost 90% of the population is oppressed because of skin color.
>“We were very wealthy,” says Errol. “We had so much money at times we couldn't even close our safe.”
>With one person holding the money in place, another other would slam the door.
>“And then there'd still be all these notes sticking out and we'd sort of pull them out and put them in our pockets.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musks-dad-tells-bi-abou...
There are not only 3 other differing accounts, but others have vouched for the fact that Elon arrived in Canada with just $1000 and often had to shower at the YMCA in the early days. He’s also on record having worked various low paying manual labor odd jobs in Canada. Not exactly what you’d expect from a son of generational exploitation wealth.
I dont buy the claim and strongly believe Paypal was built to move undeclared stolen/smuggled resource wealth into the western banking system.
The average American is generally clueless about how white miners have historically operated in Africa. Not totally the public's fault since positive spin is relatively cheap/easy to buy for these types.
I am not sure it is a very sensible way to do that. Electronic paper trails everywhere.
"Message received" redux, perhaps? [0]
Specifically, DFEH invited Tesla to participate in a mediation session with the department’s internal dispute resolution division on January 12 and 20, 2022, but Tesla refused to attend until February 8, 2022.
As it not only indicates that the compulsory "mediation" process is basically a sham (as these things always are), but that Tesla knowingly and willfully refused to take action that might have addressed the concerns raised by the plaintiffs. So they were forced to bring this suit, in other words.