Furthermore looking at who owned an institution 30-40 years ago doesn't really add any value to the conversation about what they are today.
Furthermore looking at who owned an institution 30-40 years ago doesn't really add any value to the conversation about what they are today.
The New Republic isn't a GOP outlet, sure. It might even occasionally slightly hurt centrist sensibilities, which would put it left of the NYT. But if you think that's "hard left", you haven't seen hard left, or even moderate left.
Try something like wsws.org, or The Jacobin. The New Republic isn't remotely that.
What are the actual ends of the spectrum on which you identify the NR's position as "hard left" ?
They’re about as milquetoast neoliberal as you can get, but they typically skew towards diversity and democracy which is probably enough to make you a steenkin pinko to some people.