Color Recasts Itself as a Facebook Photo and Video App
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
The first time he used it to indicate he wasn't lucky (less than 10% of downloaders using Color), the second time to indicate that they could change the way facebook users interact (if the app is a success). I felt it was odd to see him use it both positively and negatively in a few paragraphs, and think it may indicate that he's not confident in this latest pivot (the first use felt more true).
Not that that sounds technologically unfeasible, but they made it sound like a current feature. The fact that their $41 million in funding is now basically an aggregation of Facebook photos plus FaceTime seems to indicate that it was complete vaporware.
Ten percent of users returning to an app that has almost no utility whatsoever (due to so few other users using it around you). That's actually quite a success, but I'm guessing that number is bull.
>Mr. Nguyen, who described himself as a “social recluse,” said that he realized that Color needed to be more engaging and more social to lure in new users who would find it rewarding.
Facebook wouldn't have been a success if its creator hadn't released it while he was in college. It's hard to imagine Color, in its ambitious proximity-based plan, ever being successful with a CEO who doesn't get out.