Ask HN: Why do HR / recruiters care so much about gaps in employment? | Hacker News Reader

Ask HN: Why do HR / recruiters care so much about gaps in employment?

3 pointsmgh210 comments

I noticed this activity has decreased due to COVID, but still the question itself is annoying.

Here is Reddit's take, but I wanted to know about it in tech https://www.reddit.com/r/jobs/comments/7wv4o3/why_do_hr_recruiters_care_so_much_about_gaps_in/

View on HN

I did not understand that a gap could be meaningful until they day I was face to face with an employee who had just torn the flesh off his knuckles by punching a brick wall in a fit if rage. He had been coming in late for several days and I was explaining to him he was going to need to focus on coming in on time. It seemed like a very low key chat, held outside so it was private. His response was to fly into an uncontrolled rage, chest heaving, red faced, where he body punched the wall next to us. I was shocked and asked him what was wrong. He explained that he had a problem with negative feedback, but he was getting better. The evidence was he had hit the wall rather than me. As he calmed down he explained that the break in his work record was some years in a mental institution due to assault. I was out if my depth. He was a nice guy but clearly needed more support than I was equipped for. I talked to my boss and the company got in touch with his doctor. I think everyone decided he was not ready for the workplace yet. Other gaps I have seen have been terms in prison, long illnesses, and periods of personal instability. None of those should be a bar from employment but they all indicate a need for appropriate support if an employee is going to be successful.

Which is ironic, becomes sometimes it is the cumulative effect of the negative working conditions at some of these jobs that causes the "long illness and periods of personal instability" in the first place.

Exception? There could have been hundreds of other good reasons, hope recruiters are not as judgmental.

If a company has an HR department or is a recruitment firm, they are trying to do one difficult thing: filter resumes down to a small enough number to interview.

This is hard for them because they have no idea what they're doing. The people reviewing the resumes don't have domain expertise and are often among the least-skilled people in an org.

To make this type of activity scale, they essentially have to come up with universal filters that remove human judgment from the process. This includes removing people with gaps in their resumes.

Why doesn't this change? Because normally you have enough candidates that you can remove all the people with gaps and still have too many candidates.

When there's a labor shortage, as there is now, that doesn't apply. But a lot of recruiting operations haven't adjusted for the labor pool and are just ending up with too few candidates.

But a lot of recruiting operations haven't adjusted for the labor pool and are just ending up with too few candidates.

Hence the labor "shortage".

I think the shortage is real and a combination of factors:

1) Fewer people are choosing (or able) to work. A lot of parents became stay-at-home parents out of necessity due to schools closing, being unable to afford childcare, hating their job, etc.

2) Nearly 1 million extra adults are dead due to Covid. It can be hard to replace an experienced, middle-aged worker, especially in more specialized roles.

3) Employers have not fixed recruiting (as you alluded): they're still filtering out good candidates, paying too little, failing to offer remote options, etc.

Because they have no understanding of what this work is actually like.

And hence, of the fact that sometimes you need to step back for a while just to maintain your bloody health and sanity.

I always assumed it was attempting to suss out if you'd been fired, since that naturally leads to a gap in your resume (and depending on how in demand your skills are, could lead to longer gaps).

It's also possibly just normal curiosity - most people don't have gaps in their resume.

I suspect most people past a certain age

Say 16

Have employment gaps in their resume

Assuming they are working class

I think the "were you fired?" and "why did you get fired?" and "Was it a violent crime you seved time for?" questions are prob the main reason why

The other 95% is probably CYA

Because they are sheep and believe a gap actually means something.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com