I have no doubt there are edge cases where Bing/DDG outperform Google, but most of the time I have better luck with Google.
I have no doubt there are edge cases where Bing/DDG outperform Google, but most of the time I have better luck with Google.
I'll add that I could have been more clever with my query. For instance, if I surround the lyric in quotes, Google returns the right result first.
Original query: like you didn't care I don't know why lyrics r&b
Improved query: "like you didn't care I don't know why" lyrics r&b
At the end of the day, I'm not frustrated with Google. I use it every day and it saves me lots of time. It just amuses me that in some cases, other engines that probably use simpler search algorithms are objectively better. And in this case, I think it's fair to expect Google to produce the right result on page 1.
"packages not in the aur"
rake "invalid session id"
"pacman -Qm"
arch "The pgAdmin 4 server could not be contacted"
"previous definition of HTML_NAMESPACE was here"
illustrator "print preview" is darker
systemd Loaded: bad-setting "has a bad unit file setting"
Don't fully understand what is going on here. Safe search is disabled. Worse results would be expected, but zero results seems like an excessive amount of censorship. Other similar search terms work fine.