And the fact that there's a chain of other responders disagreeing with your take suggests that it isn't.

Either way, I don't have a horse in this fight. You may as well be right in your assessment.

The fact of the matter though is this - the original blog post is completely uninteresting. If you have wealth and money - you can pretty much build anything anywhere. There's nothing in that house that is a technological marvel/achievement or anything in its construction method that warrants unique news coverage on HN or elsewhere.