Why don't I see any ads after enabling them?
support.brave.com
support.brave.com
It's way too easy to fire up 1000's of cloud instances with brave browsers watching ads automatically all day.
If you don't care about earning a few bucks a months then use a vpn.
I am a happy Brave user for the last 5 years. FF is my backup browser but I tend to find the need to use it less and less.
What have I missed?
Submitters: please don't do either of those things! Both are against the site guidelines, which ask: "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html).
If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's fine, but do it by adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
This is HN, and one might hope we can do better than BuzzFeed. In fact, Brave probably would want you to use a VPN, they sell their own VPN service after all [2].
[1]: https://support.brave.com/hc/en-us/articles/360026648512-How...
Do you think that this is something browser vendors should do, ie. that the absence of the feature is something that must be explained?
Also, I apologize for being a little bit too harsh in my previous comment.
As far as I know, this is something that happens automatically without user intervention, and I don't see any settings or buttons to push related to this.
Therefore, if you use a VPN while using Brave, you might be flagged as "suspect."
Is this why even though they partnered with Guardian to provide VPN services for iOS in 2020 [1] they have yet to provide desktop support?
---
Yes, there is. Just don't turn on the ad rewards.
The ad matching is anonymized, so it can't really tell where jamesdwilson is really connecting from. All it can know is that there is one device that connected from one place but wants to claim that is has seen an ad intended for another country.
Imagine if you are responsible for the "ad confirmation" service and your job is to ensure that there is no abuse of the ad delivery. Do you think it would be okay for it to issue the ad confirmation to your device? How would you design a system that could avoid fake viewers?
This is just about Brave Ads, an optional component some users opt in to. VPNs are used for ad fraud and may reduce traffic quality, so it’s understandable that they turn off ads for some VPN users.
I’ve been using Brave for over a year and always use VPN.
Also, I used Brave for a few months with a VPN enabled and had no issues with ads or redeeming BAT, so it clearly is just one factor they take into consideration when looking for ad fraud.
The Brave ads are entirely optional, requiring user opt-in, and it is hard to criticize them for defaulting to not showing ads if they suspect the user is fake. Their advertisers pay to show their ads to real users, not headless browsers in a data center.
No. The last part of your sentence is what stops them from being able to do the first.
There is absolutely nothing stopping any competitor to set a different ad network that also uses BAT as the payout. There is nothing stopping Facebook (or any other media company actually) to start accepting BAT for payments.
The difference of course being that Google and Apple at least pay you well and in dollars rather than a crypto token that has been premined by the company that also happens to run the browser and in reality isn't going to be adopted outside of the Brave ecosystem. Imagine if Amazon started to pay its vendors in Amazon gift cards, that's what Brave is. (everyone is free to accept amazon gift cards, of course!)
Yes, there is. There is a good part of the world where people can not accept payments in dollars, so the revenue share program wouldn't work.
Not to mention the tipping system. If they wanted to do with "real cash", they would have to either find a global partner like Western Union (yuck), or partner with PayPal (double yuck) or become themselves a money transmitter (basically impossible)
Granted, what they could've done would be to use another existing token. And they did just that, at first. The first version used BTC. It didn't catch on. It was only later that they did the ICO.
It would be nice if they used a stabletoken, but DAI was launched after BAT's ICO, Tether is poison and USDC is centralized. BAT is not ideal, but there was no better alternative at that point in time.
> terms and conditions set by, you'll never guess it, the Brave developers.
In the ad network that is built-in to the browser, sure. But again, there is nothing stopping a competitor to make another ad network, with a similar structure, which displays ads in their own properties. And if were starting now, what do you think would be easier: to get users to be interested in something that can give them more BAT, or something that would give them a different type of "gift card"?
> in reality isn't going to be adopted outside of the Brave ecosystem.
Why? If no one else realizes that the is possible to use BAT without depending on Brave, then you'd have a self-fulfilling prophecy.
But I could easily argue that this is not really true. BAT is already part of the DeFI ecosystem (accepted by MakerDAO as one of the currencies to provide stability to DAI), youtubers and content creators are getting more aware of it, there are already people providing services that accept BAT as payment, there is a guy selling coffee for BAT... Brave does not control any of it directly.
You’ve heard of Wikipedia?