Hacker News Reader

Comment by NelsonMinar | Hacker News Reader

Simpler way: use real financial instruments. Traditional financial systems have had solutions for errors like this for centuries.

View on HN

Reading the reddit thread; it seems like this individual was an OG miner and just held ETH for many years. His previous time investment matured, and he decided to finally cash out.

lol cash out by probably trying to hide it from exchanges and then pwned themselves in the process.

exchanges would take ETH without wrapping it

to get real fiat/cash (not tether) you need an exchange, or meet someone on the street I guess (but you might get held up or something that way).

Obviously, my comment applies to people wishing to do transfers via cryptocurrencies, for one or another reason. Sometimes it's not possible to do transfers via the traditional financial system, or desirable. My comment was written for those who wish to use it, but want to make sure it gets right.

Traditional financial systems don't have solutions even for small typos [1]. Modern financial systems on the other hand have switched to IBAN which has a checksum.

[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2019/dec/07/i-lost-my-1930...

Accidentally transferring half a million dollars to the wrong external account is going to be an absolute mess to recover. There are ways to stop it if you catch it RIGHT away, but it will turn into a nightmare pretty quickly.

Lol verifying with small amounts takes like 5 extra minutes, messing up and having to jump through hoops to fix your errors will take days, especially if you do it on weekends or holidays. And they may not be reversible easily, e.g. IIRC one bank accidently paid off the loan of one of their boderline-default customers to another bank and then couldnt get the money back.

> IIRC one bank accidently paid off the loan of one of their boderline-default customers to another bank and then couldnt get the money back

That was a story because it was an incredibly unusual set of circumstances that meant they didn't get their money back - the bank owed the recipients money to repay a loan, and as such the money sent could easily have been a prepayment of the loan, which often happens before legal action is started, as happened a couple of days later. There was no way to distinguish an intentional action and a mistake here, hence the court ruling in favour of the recipient.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com