> Given Epic's premeditated nature of the initial contract break
That's how a lawsuit would have to work, the courts don't typically like ruling on hypotheticals between two private entities.
That's how a lawsuit would have to work, the courts don't typically like ruling on hypotheticals between two private entities.
Epic must violate Apple's terms of use in order to be injured by the application of them, in order for Epic to have standing to allege those terms are an abuse of monopoly power.
IIRC the legal community used to kind of dislike these, and I think there might have been a penalty for doing it. But obviously that’s no more