As you can imagine, we all became instant members of the “we need a better name for this process” club. Thank you, OP for giving us a completely viable alternative. I’m calling it a “disquisition” from here on in.
As you can imagine, we all became instant members of the “we need a better name for this process” club. Thank you, OP for giving us a completely viable alternative. I’m calling it a “disquisition” from here on in.
Did your group somehow started using 'postmortem' instead of 'afterparty'? Because if every event you organize require scheduling a postmortem then it is no longer a postmortem and just a regular activity.
So technically, we only hold one if things went wrong.
If we ever held an event where everything went right, then yes, we’d totally call that one an afterparty.
> Tearing in to what went well, what didn’t go well, and suggesting process changes for the next event
is the regular [performance|postfactum|event] analysis, but it IS NOT the postmortem!
From your previous comment you understand what the term means "after death". Did you really think "after death" and "after event" are the same?