University mandates sensitivity course that uses redacted slurs

Admitting that I've no sense of the article's accuracy, completeness, etc... My reaction is that the law school should be quietly shut down. If their students can't (or aren't expected to) handle bad language in a "redacted, on paper, in the classroom" context - how in the world could they cope in real-world legal practice, where actual people might use such language in their presence - without redaction, and with emotionally charged tones and/or body language - with large sums and/or people's lives at stake?

Next up, we'll have "surgeons" who can't cope with the sight of blood, and "plumbers" who can't stomach the smell of sewage.

I could tell just by reading the various related articles that the university has only a few choices here. The problem is that UIC did a number of things procedurally wrong and ultimately, they did restrict the freedom of their academic faculty in a way that violates the fundamental agreement between a professor and university.

They have no choice here but to restore his class and admit they violated his intellectual freedom. I am curious why the professor chose to use that specific language- IE, was he trying to create a court case? Just a naive guy writing a question?