Tennessee School Board Bans Holocaust Graphic Novel over ‘Vulgar’ Words, Themes
wsj.com
wsj.com
I watched a lot of films about the history of the United States and World War II when I was in high school, but the first-hand accounts of concentration camp life did not make the impact on me that Maus did.
Looking back, it was the first media that I can think of that reimagined a terrible historical fact in a way that I found respectful to the victims.
You can tell that these people are so very close to actually understanding how literature can challenge you and force you to grapple with complex ideas and to introspect and reflect, and yet... they just miss it.
[1] https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_...
We did some 40 years ago when I was in middle school, has this really changed? Or are we just burying our heads in the sand and saying that the internet and such doesn't exist?
> hiding that fact behind a veneer of “you’re trying to suppress information about the Holocaust” is shameful.
I think the veneer goes the other way. That is, the parents are banning something that illustrates an important and painful part of real human history under the pretext that it contains bad language and difficult themes. Well yeah, that's the point.
"I’m just wild about Harry, and Harry’s wild about me \ The heavenly blisses of his kisses, fill me with ecstasy \ He’s sweet just like chocolate candy \ Just like honey from the bee \ Oh I am just wild about Harry, and he’s just wild about me"
Example: https://archive.fo/3W3SZ
Which are unfortunate (these curriculum removals), in my view -- because they blunt the discussion of just how pervasively racist American society was at the time. And in effect, serves to further enshrine and empower the word's status as a weapon and trigger.
* Is it a ban on availability? Meaning the school won't make the book available to students (e.g. in a school library).
* Is it a ban on integration into curriculum? Meaning the school has decided that no teacher may require students to read the book as a course requirement.
* Is it a ban on REQUIRED integration into curriculum? Meaning the school has decided that it isn't going to force teachers to require students to read the book, but each individual teacher may still choose to do so at their discretion.
* Is it a ban on possession? Meaning if you bring the book into school, it will be confiscated.
And then, of course, there are further distinctions.
A particular book might be appropriate for some mature AP English students who are preparing to enter college in the fall, but inappropriate for most middle schoolers. So let's say you have a school that's grades 7-12, with a shared library. Does the librarian determine appropriateness based on whether it's inappropriate for none/some/most/all?
I'm an author of several books, and I tend to be against outright bans. That said, I'm the parent of a 12-year-old who reads at a mid-high-school level, but has the emotional maturity of a kindergartener, and I can absolutely understand where parents are coming from when they hear about books being integrated into curricula that they know their kids don't have the maturity to handle.
The term 'banned' seems to get more clicks and more emotional reaction.