> She makes things, and was accused by the publisher of "Make" magazine of being a fake, with some guy doing the actual work.
That's fucked up. Why would someone accuse anyone of being a fake, just because they didn't look a certain way? Detestable.
That's fucked up. Why would someone accuse anyone of being a fake, just because they didn't look a certain way? Detestable.
I respect her a ton for doing what she's doing, and if I remember correctly, she had to install a very elaborate and advanced security system at her home to feel safe.
Sad.
They made huge contributions to their Maker movement and gave me $9 Pro Micros, and I’m thankful of it, but I won’t forget that they always are like that.
I was once told in an interview for a statistician role that the questions were designed for male candidates and I shouldn't worry if I struggle with them. And this was a big FTSE 100 company.
So I would show up to job interviews in a basic black suit, and I liked the way I felt when I wore it. The old-school attitude about "Dress for Success" is just one more thing that's become retro and ironic these days.