Not being funny, but there are plenty of western countries that don't go around censoring this stuff. There's one massive leader in it.
I’ll never understand how a nipple is more offensive than shooting someone.
But full nudity and sex? Noooo, we can't have that! Thanks, Puritan America.
Male and female bodies will never be the same, and they shouldn't be.
That should have zero implications on equality though. It means that it is trickier to achieve
Do you have a point?
Having a binary 'you have been demonetized' flag just seems like a way to stir discontent.
She has not been demonetised, despite the clickbait title, but classified as adult which means roughly 99% less ad revenue.
Correct
The assumption being in this case that advertisers will pay for ads when a man creates a nude female torso and not when a woman creates a nude female torso and YouTube is simply acting on their behalf?
I think the reason people see demonization as censorship follows the same lines as seeing non-government censorship or "ceasing to do business" (in an industry that generally does business with everybody) as censorship. They aren't exactly going out and burning books, sure, but it's certainly exclusionary and it's certainly targeted.
What's wrong with demonitizing all the videos of gay people? "It's not censorship." Still seems to have most of the negative impacts of censorship. It's a spade to me.
So SexyCyborg would, unsurprisingly, prefer to be on youtube. But she's also dancing on the edge of what people call "adult" (again, I'm presenting no personal opinion here: take it up with Liberty Mutual if you don't like the definition). So naturally she's going to have trouble with those boundaries. PornHub never would have kicked her off, but she doesn't want to be on PornHub.
It's all about money here, not freedom. That was my point.
https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/105920334/my-chann...