Yes it sounds a bit culty but many interviewers I used to work with put a ton of weight in these principles and the hiring process is designed to seriously consider them (they are not an afterthought). You wanna have these down pat and is probably the lowest effort way you can increase your odds. 2 hrs studying and considering these will likely go farther than doing 2 LeetCode practice questions during that time period.
You can answer all their questions with flying colours, but if you don't have "situations" handy, it won't matter.
Also most of it is behavior questioning so key up on that.
People aren't wrong about Amzn for the most part but there are good dept/mgrs as well as sh*tty ones. Mostly money power fame driven, nothing more. No diff than any other jerks in other companies. And I've worked in all but one of the FAANG/M.
I actually agree with all of these company's motto of driving the 1yr hires to the ground. Why? because although they get burnt out, they get paid well, keep sign on bonuses but the pay off for the company? Your dedication to prove your worth by working 10x harder 18hrs a day for a year. Can't beat that. I say that's actually a decent biz model in IMHO. Just to clarify in the bayarea, your 1st year, you would be walking away with some north of $250k base+sign on+1st yr vesting.
The only accurate part is the last part where you said that it can be stressful and there are sometimes long hours but working weekends is not "common" unless you are oncall and even when you are oncall on most teams you likely won't even be paged.
Also not so much long hours bc you do that elsewhere too but it's more of high pressure to get things done even when things that don't work isn't your area to deal it. That's one of their most coveted principles: bias for action.
This seems to conflict with every other sentence in your post.
Frankly, I wouldn't work for AWS based on how I hear they treat people. Either way, it might be good to have a contingency interview with a different company.