Tesla FY2021 Earnings Result
tesla-cdn.thron.com
tesla-cdn.thron.com
* Vehicles delivered: 0.31M/quarter = 1.24M/year run-rate (Q4 YoY growth: 71%).
* Total revenues: $17.7B/quarter = $70.8B/year run-rate (Q4 YoY growth: 65%).
* Cash flow from operations: $4.6B/quarter (Q4 YoY growth: 52%).
* Capital expenditures: $1.8B/quarter (Q4 YoY growth: 57%).
* Vehicle-producing factories: 2 online (California, Shanghai), 2 in testing (Berlin, Texas), ~4 in development (locations TBA).
A 5-7x increase in vehicle production over the next five years, from 1.24M to 6-8M vehicles, looks... quite realistic at this point -- gasp. By all counts, Musk and his team have successfully created a major automaker from the ground-up in a record short amount of time. Kudos to them!
They are doing terrific.
- Multiple references to the FSD. Promised FSD to be ready this year again.
- Dojo may not be ready and not faster than a cluster of GPUs
- Solar installations are dawn
In general very positive results.
[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4481919-tesla-inc-tsla-ceo-...
I mean, yes, the stopped clock was right this time. Most of the time it's just a stopped clock. Most bubbles are bubbles.
https://drivetribe.com/p/tesla-is-jerry-rigging-its-cooling-...
So many things I've read about Tesla quality makes me think that they are just not well built vehicles. I know I didn't bother looking at them when I bought a new car last year.
(I have no skin in this game, just a thought from a pretty casual observer)
(own Teslas, all mostly well built, the newer the better)
My parents GM was a constant piece by of crap and would endlessly overheat and brake.
Your sentence is falling apart as well.
While it can be valuable to point out to ESL speakers/writers, in this case that's not a productive criticism.
In this case, Tesla obviously ran into an unexpected problem, and did not have a part to fasten this piece. They used various fasteners to secure it, and I'm not aware that anyone has had any problems with it, except that it seems strange.
At the time, Sandy Munro saw something similar in his tear-down, and didn't think it was a big deal. Obviously not a permanent part, but nothing to be worried about, either.
You might say "well agility is great, except in my self-driving car" but I would remind you that people said the same thing about security software, infrastructure, etc. and were wrong every time. My believe is cars will get safer and better built faster with them innovating than with the traditional model of annual incremental releases. As a Tesla owner, I can also comment that the car feels no less well built than any other car I've owned.
Is that really the case? I heard their motors are pretty good. But the batteries are mostly Philips and there is a lot of innovation happening thorughout the industry. The software is in parts miles ahead, but their latest UX dicisions are getting dumber and dumber.
> shown that agility and shipping quickly is a better practice than waiting for perfection.
I would argue there is a sweet spot, which Tesla is obviously missing.
> You might say "well agility is great, except in my self-driving car" but I would remind you that people said the same thing about security software, infrastructure, etc. and were wrong every time.
Except for example with the 737 MAX development or the whole "a package got deleted from npm and broke everything". There is a reason for LTS-versions and thorough testing, especially when lives are at stake. My best counterexample to your argument would be Teslas "Full-Self-Driving". It's next year for the last five years, totally insecure and unpredictable, killed people and isn't even better than what the competition has to offer.
I know I can slowly work out "Model Y, Long Range." But it's not intuitive and you kind of have to be a "Tesla insider" to get that far, or at least closely follow their options/trim levels.
It's a bit better than the "M3" I sometimes see thrown around, because an M3 is a BMW, through and through. The car is actually a Model 3, and there's no reason to abbreviate it further unless you're on a Tesla forum (in my opinion.)
I myself put my Tesla under a microscope trying to find every unsatisfactory item on the delivery day and I did see some uneven panels. But my wife also got a Subaru the same year and I put it under the same kind of scrutiny and it also had similar differences in paneling. Especially under the hood, either the design of parts wasn’t that great or they just put some non standard items to hold things together. It didn’t seem any better than a Tesla (or any cheaper).
Unless wood or zip ties are deficient for the applications they are in, they don't count as cutting corners in my book.
That was a temporary thing that happened for like a few weeks a long time ago.
Since then, the S has been refreshed (including Plaid mode), making it more competitive. They are now in a situation where demand outstrips supply, with extensive delays to get hold of a Model X in particular. To me this signals that demand is now there, but Tesla is actively making the choice to focus on the 3 and Y production volume (which also contributes to the Cyber Truck, Roadster, and Semi all not being available yet).
Here's the story in numbers:
Q4 2020: 16,097
Q1 2021: 0
Q2 2021: 2,340
Q3 2021: 8,941
Q4 2021: 13,109
As you can see, the refresh required Tesla to redo production lines, which were shutdown for the whole of Q1 2021After that the production is steadily climbing up and is on a clear trajectory to surpass before-refresh numbers.
S/X are sold out months in advance and Tesla reduced number of variants and options, both facts pointing to being limited by production not demand for the cars.
[1] https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/model-x-plaid-reserv...