Why would the author need to be "unbiased" and what would "unbiased" look like to you ?
Maybe "unbiased" would look more like your crypto-happy post history ?
Maybe "unbiased" would look more like your crypto-happy post history ?
(Now you added a personal attack about their post history, I don't think that's constructive.)
By this metric, calling the author’s bias “stupefying” is a personal attack. So either this entire thread is not constructive and your participation is exacerbating the problem or you’re merely providing cover fire for janandonly.
Personally, viewing your other comments in this thread, I’m inclined to believe it’s the later.
> viewing your other comments in this thread, I’m inclined to believe it’s the later [sic]
I have one other comment as of now...