I’ll save everyone some time: the article doesn’t contain any stats, nor mentions of how the survey was done or which scientific disciplines were undervalued. It also doesn’t link to any peer-reviewed article where the author could have filled those gaps. It however links to articles from reputable scientific journals such as Business insiders or the New York Times and myths such as the "wage gap".

It’s ironic considering the article is whining about some scientific disciplines being considered less rigorous, yet makes no attempt to be rigorous itself.