As far as I can tell, the point is to show the tiny difference in this particular study between the vaccinated and placebo for both total deaths and Covid deaths. It does that, and looking at the original tables doesn't change anything of note, as far as I can see.
"Today we have more data, and you can see that there were similar number of deaths in the vaccine and placebo groups.
The trials did not show a reduction in death, even for Covid deaths, as opposed to other causes…"
(Emphasis mine.)
Regardless, what relevant data is missing from the table? As far as I can tell, you can see all relevant data to determine both total deaths and Covid deaths from the table in the screenshot.
Huh? It's a quote presented by the article as support for their assertion that vaccinated people die at similar rates as unvaccinated people. An assertion that's flat-out false, and that their own source refutes if you look at the original data from it, rather than relying on the misleadingly-cropped and blurred version presented in the article.
Sure, if you examine the chart closely, like I did, you see that it's not really saying what the author is telling you it's saying. Then if you look up the actual research study (which you'll have to type the url because the referenced links are also screenshots) you see that it definitely doesn't say what the author says it does. But how many people are going to do that? As the author is well aware, not many.