It’s incredibly transparent as to what they’re doing. That Google became the most anti-consumer company out there is pretty disgraceful.
It’s incredibly transparent as to what they’re doing. That Google became the most anti-consumer company out there is pretty disgraceful.
I've at least been "captchaed" in Firefox. While being logged in with my Gmail account from 2005.
BTW: Yes, I absolutely noticed that you said this above:
> ...and the beauty of the Internet is that there's really no way to be sure people are being genuine...
My point is, unless the claims of the others are outrageous or we have something very specific to point at, I don't think voicing these kind of thoughts do much good.
I'm not going to jump through hoops to prove a negative, but correlation does not imply causation.
My empirical observation: For many years I have constantly used Google search on FF with many machines and networks, logged in and not, in private mode and not, with all existing privacy features enabled and no extensions beyond a password manager. Napkin math conservatively estimates I've conducted 200k searches minimum using this combo. I've consistently encountered suspicious activity challenges when using overcrowded proxies, NAT'd networks and VPNs. Removing those factors has never failed to stop the challenges. Ever.
I'm confident the poster's observations are accurate. My observation does not directly contradicts their observation, but it does contradicts their conclusion. I wouldn't be surprised if other factors like JS being enabled, cookie settings, plugins that affected those things, number of other users on their network, or even the public IP range they fall under would affect it.
On a VPN I do not get it, so the last couple of weeks I have been making heavy use of my mullvad account.
Edit: however. I only store cookies for fastmail and hacker news and do not allow JS on many sites.
That happend to me only when using tor.
There are some sites I can't login at all unless I change the browser. SoundCloud is one of them.
Usually when they do that its because you are on the same network that a lot of abuse has come from.
A faked header might look even more suspicious to their algorithm?