Just because it’s not tech doesn’t mean it’s not hard.

Are you concerned Nike might steal Apple’s computer design know-how?

I don’t really know anything about fashion, but I find it hard to believe that anyone would take Apple seriously as a high-end fashion brand. To me they seem like Target: undoubtedly more fancy than Walmart, but it’s not like that’s a high bar.

And sure, maybe the fashion eites of the world all use Apple products, but that’s more a consequence of the duopolies and a lack of choice for consumers rather than any actual merit of the brand itself.

MANGA

MAMAA (Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon) looks like the winner at the moment. Big Tech doesn't seem to like most of the alphabet (even though one of them is literally called that).

I hope not, MAGA is kind of overloaded at this point. If you add Microsoft, you can have:

MAMAA (Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Apple, Amazon)

or

GAMMA (using G for Google but not F for Facebook seems incosistent but it's a better acronym overall)

Grouping companies based on how well they fit into a pronounceable acronym, at this point, seems a little silly.

MAGMA adding microsoft in.

No need for an acronym: simply call them the monopolists.