1. It's ironic that you are asking us to invoke belief in a statement that is merely asserted and not demonstrated.

2. I agree that the issue won't be resolved by logic alone. However, based on Craig's previous debates, he will clearly define his terms and premises, and name the principles of logic used to reach a conclusion. To assert that such debate is "the epitome of irrationality" is itself irrational. You may disagree with his premises and definitions, but that is not the same as irrationality.

3. Dawkins has been asked again and again to debate Craig, and has refused again and again. As I've said before, other prominent atheists have criticised Dawkins on this matter.

4. You can download a number of Craig's debates here: http://rfforum.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2703927