> Well, yes.
Can you explain why you think he should spend more than four hours a day, every day, working entirely for someone else’s benefit?
> Well, yes.
Can you explain why you think he should spend more than four hours a day, every day, working entirely for someone else’s benefit?
I am ok with that, but I'd rather work as a clerk on the DMV instead of my current job which is rather stressful but has the benefit that if I don't screw up I'm retiring early.
Taxes go to communities. Profiting for yourself only defeats communities.
Beyond that, he lives in a society, is only able to make that money through the support of that society. Note he chose to move to California, so clearly he's gaining a lot from California.
Not sure what to make of that; I work more than 40 hours a week, but my total compensation is also above 500k/year.
There somewhere I can work less, but maintain that level of compensation?