If the supposed FSD still requires an individual to fully man the vehicle, what is the point of having it? It seems like bloatware surveilling you with little benefit to the user similar to what modern phones do.
If the supposed FSD still requires an individual to fully man the vehicle, what is the point of having it? It seems like bloatware surveilling you with little benefit to the user similar to what modern phones do.
Level 5 or bust.
But now that I say that. Was it Auto-pilot which legal is cruise control? Or was it Full-Self Driving and the car made a decision? Legally it’s a matter of man vs machine of it is FSD. Is man wrong if there was even the slightest attempt to correct the machine’s decision after the fact? If it is in fact legal to allow said machine to act while supervised.
It could also be a matter of arguing current training and regulation for FSD, is regulation of drivers sufficient for what now is a new mode of private transportation? Should autonomous vehicles be allowed to be owned yet, do they really fit under the same umbrella as normal license? Or should they be special like a CDL or MJ licenses?
It would be harder to charge them with criminal violations, but civil charges are possible against them (and the manufacturer) even if the driver is criminally culpable.